On February 27, 2015, following President Obama’s announcement last month that the administration would be pushing for a consumer privacy bill of rights, the Administration posted the “Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2015.”  The proposed legislation is aimed at restricting how companies may handle consumer data.

In short, the draft bill would require companies to prominently notify users what data they collect and  how they use it.  It aims to ensure that the information is protected, to allow consumers to access their records and to require deletion after the data has fulfilled its purpose.  The draft bill restricts the collection of data to that which is “contextual,” in other words, not having it re-used or sold in unanticipated ways.  The proposed bill also provides that if a person withdraws his or her consent for data collection, a company has 45 days to delete the information.

The proposal comes on the heels of the Federal Communications Commission’s vote early this week to enact strong net neutrality rules.

To read more about how privacy advocates and tech companies are reacting, click here.

Information conveyed in this article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute, nor should it be relied upon, as legal advice. No person should act or rely on any information in this article without seeking the advice of an attorney. 

{ 0 comments }

Hinch Newman Wins eCommerce Traffic Patent Fight for Top Affiliate Network

February 12, 2015

As reported in Law360 (February 11, 2015), the United States District Court, Central District of California granted Clickbooth.com’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ruling that the claims asserted by Essociate, Inc.’s Internet based affiliate pooling patent are patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and are therefore invalid.  A copy of the motion can be seen, […]

Read the full article →

Buried Terms Do Not Create Proper Notice of Browsewrap Agreement

January 3, 2015

On December 19, 2014 in the matter of Hussein v. Coinabul LLC, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held that a company selling gold for Bitcoin online could not enforce its forum selection clause because it never directed customers to its terms of services link containing the provision. Specifically, the court […]

Read the full article →

FTC Alleges “Free” Credit Report Marketers Violated Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act

November 19, 2014

The Federal Trade Commission has stopped an online scheme that allegedly lured consumers with “free” access to their credit scores and then billed them a recurring fee of $29.95 per month for a credit monitoring program they never ordered.  The three companies have agreed to pay $22 million for consumer refunds under a settlement with the […]

Read the full article →

California Anti-SPAM Decision Clarifies Rule on Issue of Identifying Sender in Body of Commercial Email

October 31, 2014

The California Court of Appeal ruled in a putative class action, Rosolowski et al. v. Guthy-Renker LLC, that a commercial email header does not violate California’s anti-SPAM statute “merely because it does not identify the official name of the entity which sent the email, or merely because it does not identify an entity whose domain name is […]

Read the full article →
Elektronik Sigara - ukash